MOTHERHOOD AND FRUSTRATION IN THE WORK OF MARGARET ATWOOD

Authors

  • Yanelis Vispo Rodríguez Facultad de comunicación y letras de la Universidad de Holguín

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64301/fc.v2i3.40

Keywords:

story, feminism, literary analysis, frustrated motherhood

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the short story The Resplendent Quetzal by Margaret Atwood from a feminist perspective. The text addresses one of the representative topics of the female imagination: frustrated motherhood. In this sense, assessments are made about the presence of the topic in feminist theory, in order to clarify a definition of the concept of frustrated motherhood. Next, a look is taken at the historical treatment of the maternal figure in literary works of the universal canon, with the intention of considering the different ways that have been adopted when representing frustrated motherhood in literature. Subsequently, the analysis of the story allows us to appreciate the use of symbolic and discursive elements leading to reflection on issues such as the desacralization of motherhood, the historical invisibility of the figure of the mother, the different ways of experiencing frustrated motherhood in marriage, as well as frustrated motherhood as a conscious and personal decision. The above study provokes a reflection on the social stereotypes that weigh on women and motherhood at the present time and that hinder their autonomy and personal growth. It also opens paths for delving deeper into Margaret Atwood's work, in which themes of feminist interest can be mapped, such as the manipulation of motherhood and female social domination, which permeate the literary production of the Canadian author.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirre, C. y Golfieri, A. (2024). La construcción de la maternidad en la serialidad contemporánea: el caso de The Handmaid’s Tale (HULU, 2017). Revista AVANCES, 33.

Anzaldúa, G. (2007). Movimientos de rebeldía y las culturas que traicionan. Multitudes, (2), 51-60. https://www.cairn.info/journal-multitudes-2007-2-page-51.htm

Atwood, M. (2009). El quetzal resplandeciente y otros relatos. Arte y Literatura.

Boletín del INAH (2008). “Estudian colibríes ofrendados en Templo Mayor”. México, INAH – CONACULTA. Viernes 28 de noviembre de 2008.

Díaz Barriga Cuevas, Alejandro (2012). La representación social de la infancia mexica a principios del siglo XVI. Nuevas miradas a la historia de la infancia en América Latina: entre prácticas y representaciones, 58.

Fernández, Fong. M. (2023). Maternidad y vulnerabilidad en Medusa (2010) de Ximena Cabrera. FemCrítica. Revista de Estudios Literarios y Crítica Feminista, 1,(1), 50-60. Recuperado a partir de https://femcritica.com/index.php/fc/article/view/2

Ferrer, María Reyes (2017). La maternidad y las relaciones materno-filiales en la obra de Elena Ferrante/Motherhood and Mother-ChildRelationships in Elena Ferrante’sWork. Asparkía: investigación feminista, (31), 47-63.

Gallardo, Ortega, C.M. (2023). Ideología de la maternidad en la literatura y la sociedad. Amoxcalli. Revista de Teoría y Crítica de la literatura hispanoamericana, 6 (12), 120- 142. Recuperado a partir de https://rd.buap.mx/ojs-dm/index.php/amox/article/view/1209

Karakola, E. (2004). Diferentes diferencias y ciudadanías excluyentes: una revisión feminista. hooks, b., Brah, A., Sandoval, Ch., Anzaldúa, G., Levins Morales, A., Bhavnani, K., Coulson, M., Alexander, MJ, TalpadeMohanty, Ch. Otras inapropiables. Feminismos desde las fronteras, 9-32.

López Hernández, M. (2015). El colibrí como símbolo de la sexualidad masculina entre los mexicas. Itinerarios: Revista de estudios lingüísticos, literarios, históricos y antropológicos, 21, 79-100.

Mistral, G. (2008). Poesías. Casa de las Américas.

Sánchez Benítez, N. (2016). La experiencia de la maternidad en mujeres feministas. Nómadas, (44), 255-267.

Published

20-11-2024 — Updated on 24-11-2024

How to Cite

Vispo Rodríguez, Y. (2024). MOTHERHOOD AND FRUSTRATION IN THE WORK OF MARGARET ATWOOD. FemCrítica. Journal of Literary Studies and Feminist Criticism, 2(3), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.64301/fc.v2i3.40